pwshub.com

Amazon illegally refused to bargain with drivers’ union, NLRB alleges

Amazon has yet to comment on the NLRB charges.

Workers’ fight for $25/hour continues

After the merit ruling, Teamsters General President Sean O’Brien boasted in a press release that striking drivers had "paved the way for every other Amazon worker in the country to demand what they deserve and to get Amazon to the bargaining table."

Now more workers are joining Teamsters, seemingly impressed by the results they've achieved so far. On Wednesday, over 100 Amazon warehouse workers joined Teamsters, becoming the "first-ever group of Amazon warehouse workers to demand union recognition outside of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) election process," Teamsters said in a press release.

Warehouse workers had also secured a substantial financial offering from Amazon in September, when Amazon invested $2.2 billion to raise the base salaries of hourly fulfillment workers to more than $22 an hour and more than $29 an hour including benefits. But workers told Ars that they only got that raise because of their organizing, promising, "we'll keep fighting until we reach $25."

Amazon has previously pushed back on the NLRB determination that it's a joint employer, Reuters noted, because it allegedly "does not have enough control over drivers' working conditions."

That claim doesn't seem to gel with workers' experiences, however, as a proposed class action last year alleged that Amazon was spying on drivers, while Vice reported that footage from Amazon's invasive in-van surveillance was leaking online.

Amazon will likely dispute the joint employer determination, arguing that only contracting companies like Delivery Service Providers have immediate control over contractors. However, if the determination sticks, Amazon may be forced to bargain with all unionized contractors seeking better working conditions.

There's still a long road ahead for drivers and other Amazon employees fighting to have their unions recognized. In March, Amazon will face an administrative judge who will weigh the evidence against Amazon at a hearing, Reuters reported. After that, the NLRB can review the ruling and it can potentially be appealed in federal court.

Source: arstechnica.com

Related stories
1 month ago - Dangerous — Consumers should stop using SnoreStop, FDA says. The maker of a homeopathic nasal spray with a...
2 days ago - Injured Seahawks cornerback Tariq Woolen turned to an illegal stream to watch his teammates Sunday. Most anyone who has tried to stream legally can sympathize.
1 month ago - Opening statements before District Judge Leonie Brinkema of the US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia start later today. The BBC notes that the Justice Department plans to argue that Google's parent company, Alphabet,...
3 weeks ago - The company behind the Fortnite video games won an antitrust lawsuit against Google last year. Now Epic Games is suing again.
1 month ago - Some critics of Big Tech worry the Democratic presidential nominee’s deep ties to large tech companies could prompt friendlier treatment.
Other stories
4 hours ago - US Consumer Financial Protection Bureau demands transparency, accountability from sellers of employee metrics The US Consumer Financial Protection Bureau on Thursday published guidance advising businesses that third-party reports about...
6 hours ago - Here's today's Connections: Sports Edition answer and hints for groups. These clues will help you solve the New York Times' popular puzzle game, Connections: Sports Edition, every day.
6 hours ago - Here's today's Wordle answer, plus a look at spoiler-free hints and past solutions. These clues will help you solve New York Times' popular puzzle game, Wordle, every day!
6 hours ago - Here's today's Strands answers and hints. These clues will help you solve The New York Times' popular puzzle game, Strands, every day.
6 hours ago - Here's today's Connections answer and hints for groups. These clues will help you solve New York Times' popular puzzle game, Connections, every day!