pwshub.com

FTC cracks down on fake reviews and influencer misconduct with new rule

The U.S. Federal Trade Commission today announced a final rule that will ban marketers from using fake reviews, including those generated with artificial intelligence and other deceptive marketing methods such as paying for bots to inflate follower counts.

The rule allows the FTC to strengthen enforcement and seek civil penalties against violators.

“Fake reviews not only waste people’s time and money but also pollute the marketplace and divert business away from honest competitors,” FTC Chair Lina M. Khan said in a statement. “By strengthening the FTC’s toolkit to fight deceptive advertising, the final rule will protect Americans from getting cheated, put businesses that unlawfully game the system on notice, and promote markets that are fair, honest, and competitive.”

The final rule covers six aspects of contrived and fake marketing, starting with banning fake or false consumer rules, consumer testimonials and celebrity testimonials. The rule prohibits reviews and testimonials from someone who does not exist, such as AI-generated fake reviews and reviews from people who have no experience with or misrepresent products. Businesses are also prohibited from buying such reviews, procuring them, or disseminating them where the business knows the reviews are fake or false.

Buying positive or negative reviews is also now prohibited, with businesses no longer able to provide compensation or other incentives conditioned on the writing of consumer reviews expressing a particular sentiment, either positive or negative. Though the FTC doesn’t provide examples, the rule could particularly affect online influencers.

Insider reviews written by company insiders that fail to disclose clearly and conspicuously the giver’s material connection to the business are also now banned. Officers or managers are also limited in being able to solicit reviews from employees or relatives.

Businesses are also now prohibited from creating reviews or opinion sites that are presented as being independent review sites from providing reviews or opinions about their own products. The tactic is fairly common among tech companies; for example, a search for online video editing software often results in companies presenting so-called reviews of products that put their own products top and center.

On the social media side, under the final rule, anyone — not just companies — will be prohibited from selling or buying fake indicators of social media influence, such as followers or views generated by a bot or hijacked account. There’s a whole industry around buying fake followers and views, which will be heavily affected by the prohibition, along with countless influencers and celebrities who use such services to present their accounts as being more popular than they actually are.

Finally, and arguably the most serious in terms of legal implications, is that review suppression is now prohibited. Businesses are now prohibited from using unfounded or groundless legal threats, physical threats, intimidation or certain false public accusations to prevent or remove a negative consumer review. The rule also bars businesses from misrepresenting that reviews on a review portion of their website represent all or most reviews when negative reviews have been suppressed.

The FTC voted unanimously 5-0 to adopt the final rule, which will become effective 60 days after the date it’s published in the Federal Register. Presuming that it’s published soon, the rule should go into affect mid- to late October.

Source: siliconangle.com

Related stories
1 month ago - Regulators are circling ever closer to big tech companies — the latest being Google, which the Federal Trade Commission more than hinted this week should be broken up. It’s not at all certain that will happen, since it’s up to the judge...
1 month ago - Kamala Harris was pilloried in the press for proposing 'price controls.' She did nothing of the kind
1 month ago - The U.S. Federal Trade Commission is reportedly considering breaking up Google LLC following its intervention via amicus brief into the Epic Games Inc. v. Google case regarding Google’s practices relating to competition and payments in...
1 month ago - NEW YORK (Reuters) -Kroger sued the U.S. Federal Trade Commission on Monday, seeking to block the regulator from reviewing the grocery chain's proposed $25 billion merger with smaller rival Albertsons in its in-house tribunal. Kroger...
1 month ago - A federal judge in Texas today derailed the Federal Trade Commission’s ban on noncompete agreements, blocking the ban from taking effect in September as planned. In a 27-page opinion, District Judge Ada Brown said that the FTC didn’t have...
Other stories
14 minutes ago - Trump maintains a roughly 60% stake in Trump Media & Technology Group, which trades on the Nasdaq under the ticker symbol "DJT."
15 minutes ago - Dividend investing took a back seat ever since the AI-led craze caused everyone to pile into technology growth stocks. However, long-term investors seeking a stable and reliable income stream always look for strong dividend payers that...
15 minutes ago - It’s easy to think that once someone hits billionaire status, they'd just buy whatever they want with cash – especially something as basic as a home. But even the world's wealthiest, like Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg and Jay-Z, have taken...
15 minutes ago - On Wednesday, the Federal Trade Commission said Ryan Cohen, managing partner of RC Ventures and Chairman and CEO of GameStop Corporation (NYSE:GME), will pay a $985,320 civil penalty. This fine stems from charges that Cohen violated the...
51 minutes ago - Coming into 2024, the enterprise technology space buzzed with speculation on the future following VMware LLC’s acquisition by Broadcom Inc. Analysts and experts mused on how Broadcom would handle the portfolio direction for VMware’s many...