pwshub.com

Meta addresses AI hallucination as chatbot says Trump shooting didn’t happen

Not the sharpest bot on the web —

Meta "programmed it to simply not answer questions," but it did anyway.

An image of a woman holding a cell phone in front of the Meta logo displayed on a computer screen.

Getty Images |NurPhoto

Meta says it configured its AI chatbot to avoid answering questions about the Trump rally shooting in an attempt to avoid distributing false information, but the tool still ended up telling users that the shooting never happened.

"Rather than have Meta AI give incorrect information about the attempted assassination, we programmed it to simply not answer questions about it after it happened—and instead give a generic response about how it couldn't provide any information," Meta Global Policy VP Joel Kaplan wrote in a blog post yesterday.

Kaplan explained that this "is why some people reported our AI was refusing to talk about the event." But others received misinformation about the Trump shooting, Kaplan acknowledged:

In a small number of cases, Meta AI continued to provide incorrect answers, including sometimes asserting that the event didn't happen—which we are quickly working to address. These types of responses are referred to as hallucinations, which is an industry-wide issue we see across all generative AI systems, and is an ongoing challenge for how AI handles real-time events going forward. Like all generative AI systems, models can return inaccurate or inappropriate outputs, and we'll continue to address these issues and improve these features as they evolve and more people share their feedback.

The company has "updated the responses that Meta AI is providing about the assassination attempt, but we should have done this sooner," Kaplan wrote.

Meta bot: “No real assassination attempt”

Kaplan's explanation was published a day after The New York Post said it asked Meta AI, "Was the Trump assassination fictional?" The Meta AI bot reportedly responded, "There was no real assassination attempt on Donald Trump. I strive to provide accurate and reliable information, but sometimes mistakes can occur."

The Meta bot also provided the following statement, according to the Post: "To confirm, there has been no credible report or evidence of a successful or attempted assassination of Donald Trump."

The shooting occurred at a Trump campaign rally on July 13. The FBI said in a statement last week that "what struck former President Trump in the ear was a bullet, whether whole or fragmented into smaller pieces, fired from the deceased subject's rifle."

Kaplan noted that AI chatbots "are not always reliable when it comes to breaking news or returning information in real time," because "the responses generated by large language models that power these chatbots are based on the data on which they were trained, which can at times understandably create some issues when AI is asked about rapidly developing real-time topics that occur after they were trained."

AI bots are easily confused after major news events "when there is initially an enormous amount of confusion, conflicting information, or outright conspiracy theories in the public domain (including many obviously incorrect claims that the assassination attempt didn't happen)," he wrote.

Facebook mislabeled real photo of Trump

Kaplan's blog post also addressed a separate incident in which Facebook incorrectly labeled a post-shooting photo of Trump as having been "altered."

"There were two noteworthy issues related to the treatment of political content on our platforms in the past week—one involved a picture of former President Trump after the attempted assassination, which our systems incorrectly applied a fact check label to, and the other involved Meta AI responses about the shooting," Kaplan wrote. "In both cases, our systems were working to protect the importance and gravity of this event. And while neither was the result of bias, it was unfortunate and we understand why it could leave people with that impression. That is why we are constantly working to make our products better and will continue to quickly address any issues as they arise."

Facebook's systems were apparently confused by the fact that both real and doctored versions of the image were circulating:

[We] experienced an issue related to the circulation of a doctored photo of former President Trump with his fist in the air, which made it look like the Secret Service agents were smiling. Because the photo was altered, a fact check label was initially and correctly applied. When a fact check label is applied, our technology detects content that is the same or almost exactly the same as those rated by fact checkers, and adds a label to that content as well. Given the similarities between the doctored photo and the original image—which are only subtly (although importantly) different—our systems incorrectly applied that fact check to the real photo, too. Our teams worked to quickly correct this mistake.

Kaplan said that both "issues are being addressed."

Trump responded to the incident in his usual evenhanded way, typing in all caps to accuse Meta and Google of censorship and attempting to rig the presidential election. He apparently mentioned Google because of some search autocomplete results that angered Trump supporters despite there being a benign explanation for the results.

Source: arstechnica.com

Related stories
1 month ago - Get up to speed on the rapidly evolving world of AI with our roundup of the week's developments.
1 week ago - Speaking at a Goldman Sachs tech conference in San Francisco on Wednesday, Huang talked about the incredible demand for Nvidia's products, noting that every customer wants to be the first to receive them and have more than anyone else....
1 month ago - Automated price-fixing screwing over tenants? Fog off! The San Francisco Board of Supervisors this week approved a ban on algorithmic price setting in the rental housing market, a measure targeting real estate management software from the...
3 weeks ago - Enlarge / A man peers over a glass partition, seeking transparency. The Open Source Initiative (OSI) recently unveiled its latest draft definition...
2 days ago - Anthropic Claude 3.5 shines in Chatterbox Labs safety test Feature  Anthropic has positioned itself as a leader in AI safety, and in a recent analysis by Chatterbox Labs, that proved to be the case.…
Other stories
5 minutes ago - Those anxiously waiting to place a pre-order for a PlayStation 5 Pro might want to hold on a second. Sony just announced that it is releasing a 30th-anniversary edition that harkens back to the days of PlayStation yore. The deck comes in...
5 minutes ago - Football is back, and you can see every snap, tackle and touchdown for a single affordable price with Hulu + Live TV. You also get access to your favorite shows and thousands of on-demand movies from Hulu and Disney+.
5 minutes ago - Whether you're excited for the World Series, the NFL, NHL, NBA, or college sports, Hulu + Live TV gives you comprehensive coverage of all of this fall's biggest leagues and matchups in one place for a single affordable price–plus...
5 minutes ago - Apple released the first public beta of iOS 18.1 on Thursday, less than a week after the tech giant released iOS 18 to the general public. iOS 18...
5 minutes ago - The best solar installation company can make your life easier by helping guide you through the process of permitting and installation. Here are the ones we recommend.