pwshub.com

Elon Musk declares “it is war” on ad industry as X sues over “illegal boycott”

Elon vs. advertisers —

"We tried peace for 2 years, now it is war," Musk writes.

Illustration of a shovel being used to bury the Twitter logo

Aurich Lawson | Getty Images

Elon Musk's X Corp. today sued the World Federation of Advertisers and several large corporations, claiming they "conspired, along with dozens of non-defendant co-conspirators, to collectively withhold billions of dollars in advertising revenue" from the social network formerly known as Twitter.

"We tried peace for 2 years, now it is war," Musk wrote today, a little over eight months after telling boycotting advertisers to "go fuck yourself."

X's lawsuit in US District Court for the Northern District of Texas targets a World Federation of Advertisers initiative called the Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM). The other defendants are Unilever PLC; Unilever United States; Mars, Incorporated; CVS Health Corporation; and Ørsted A/S. Those companies are all members of GARM. X itself is still listed as one of the group's members.

"This is an antitrust action relating to a group boycott by competing advertisers of one of the most popular social media platforms in the United States... Concerned that Twitter might deviate from certain brand safety standards for advertising on social media platforms set through GARM, the conspirators collectively acted to enforce Twitter's adherence to those standards through the boycott," the lawsuit said.

The lawsuit seeks treble damages to be calculated based on the "actual damages in an amount to be determined at trial." X also wants "a permanent injunction under Section 16 of the Clayton Act, enjoining Defendants from continuing to conspire with respect to the purchase of advertising from Plaintiff."

The lawsuit came several weeks after Musk wrote that X "has no choice but to file suit against the perpetrators and collaborators in the advertising boycott racket," and called for "criminal prosecution." Musk's complaints were buoyed by a House Judiciary Committee report claiming that "the extent to which GARM has organized its trade association and coordinates actions that rob consumers of choices is likely illegal under the antitrust laws and threatens fundamental American freedoms."

Yaccarino claims “illegal boycott” is stain on industry

We contacted all of the organizations named as defendants in the lawsuit and will update this article if any provide a response.

An advertising industry watchdog group called the Check My Ads Institute, which is not involved in the lawsuit, said that Musk's claims should fail under the First Amendment. "Advertisers have a First Amendment right to choose who and what they want to be associated with... Elon Musk and X executives have the right, protected by the First Amendment, to say what they want online, even when it's inaccurate, and advertisers have the right to keep their ads away from it," the group said.

X CEO Linda Yaccarino posted an open letter to advertisers claiming that the alleged "illegal boycott" is "a stain on a great industry, and cannot be allowed to continue."

"The illegal behavior of these organizations and their executives cost X billions of dollars... To those who broke the law, we say enough is enough. We are compelled to seek justice for the harm that has been done by these and potentially additional defendants, depending what the legal process reveals," Yaccarino wrote.

Yaccarino also sought to gain support from X users in a video message. "These organizations targeted our company and you, our users," she said.

Musk followed up with a post encouraging other companies to sue advertisers and claimed that advertisers could face "criminal liability via the RICO Act." X previously filed lawsuits against the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) and Media Matters for America, blaming both for advertising losses.

X doesn't provide public earnings reports because Musk took the company private after buying Twitter. A recent New York Times article said that "in the second quarter of this year, X earned $114 million in revenue in the United States, a 25 percent decline from the first quarter and a 53 percent decline from the previous year."

Source: arstechnica.com

Related stories
1 month ago - Elon Musk has declared that “civil war is inevitable” in Keir Starmer’s Britain. A government minister called his comments “pretty deplorable.”
1 month ago - Hard-right provocateurs take aim at how the former president’s aides are positioning him for the November vote - though not at the Republican candidate himself.
1 month ago - Digital Services Act — X was reminded to not spread "content that promotes hatred or disorder." Getty...
2 days ago - Eyes on everyone: From cops to the public AI is on the verge of ushering in a new era of mass surveillance, says Oracle cofounder Larry Ellison, and his juggernaut is rip-roaring, ready to serve as the technological backbone for such AI...
1 month ago - Political tweets made up 17% percent of his feed this year — up from two percent in 2021
Other stories
50 minutes ago - As an Amazon Prime member, not only do you get a free Grubhub+ membership, you can also score $10 off your first $15 order.
50 minutes ago - Amazon's second Prime Day event of 2024 is still a few weeks away, but there are some bargains you can score now.
50 minutes ago - YouTube will roll out a new generative AI video tool named Veo later this year that'll allow creators to create 6-second clips with nothing more...
2 hours ago - FBI Director hails successful action but calls it “just one round in a much longer fight.”
2 hours ago - SocialAI takes the social media "filter bubble" to an extreme with 100% fake interactions.