pwshub.com

Silk Road Bitcoin Are 'Almost Certainly' Sold By US Gov: Lawyer

Another transfer by the US government of originally seized Bitcoin from the notorious Silk Road has sparked widespread speculation on Wednesday, August 14. Blockchain analytics firm Arkham reported yesterday that 10,000 Silk Road BTC, valued at approximately $593.5 million, were transferred to Coinbase Prime, a platform used primarily for institutional investors.

According to Arkham’s post on X: 10,000 Silk Road BTC ($593.5M) moved to Coinbase Prime. Wallet bc1ql received 10K BTC from a known US Government wallet 2 weeks ago. This BTC has just been sent on to 33J, a Coinbase Prime deposit wallet.”

Is The US Gov Selling Bitcoin?

This transaction comes on the heels of a June announcement from the US Marshals Service (USMS), part of the Department of Justice, detailing a new partnership with Coinbase Prime to provide custody and advanced trading services for the agency’s “Class 1” (large cap) digital assets. The community is torn over whether these moves signify the selling of the Bitcoin or merely a transfer for custody purposes. Thus, many speculated that the US gov is not selling.

However, Scott Johnsson, a finance lawyer and general partner at Van Buren Capital, expressed a distinct view today, arguing that the transaction signals a definitive sale of the seized assets by the US government. Johnsson remarked:

“Yes, US Marshal Service (USMS) is almost certainly selling silk road Bitcoin […] USMS has been sending BTC to a custodial address required by the terms of the servicing agreement […] Given the agreement requires USMS assets remain completely segregated, whenever a transfer is ultimately made to CB prime (or other commingled exchange address), you can be sure USMS has already sold or is selling imminently.”

Johnsson further supported his claim by referencing the DOJ’s Office of Inspector General (OIG) report and the crypto services agreement RFP, which stipulate the rapid liquidation of assets within five business days of forfeiture and the necessity of segregated wallet addresses to prevent co-mingling with other assets.

It states: “The USMS intends to resolve this issue using its planned cryptocurrency services contract, which will require the contractor to liquidate cryptocurrency within 5 business days of the asset being forfeited.”

Johnsson anticipates that formal confirmation of these sales might not emerge until the publication of the DOJ’s Asset Forfeiture Program FY2024 report in January. However, the unfolding events could provide earlier indications as more details become available through official channels or subsequent asset movements.

“Official confirmation will definitively come (at the latest) upon the DOJ’s Asset Forfeiture Program FY2024 report in January, if not earlier. I also don’t think it’s a coincidence this began in earnest following the Trump speech.”

Users on X expressed their confusion regarding Johnsson’s analysis. Rodeo queried: “These coins were supposed to be sold by the end of last year[…] You’re saying the act of transferring these coins to Coinbase from their current address is enough to imply selling because the Coinbase addresses are not completely segregated addresses?”

Responding to these concerns, Johnsson clarified: “Not necessarily Coinbase alone (there’s an interim segregated custody step), but once they hit commingled addresses it’s reasonable to infer they’re sold. And yea, there was a backlog of forfeited BTC that was supposed to be sold already. Finalizing the services agreement appears to have been (at least part of) the hold up.”

Notably, the latest BTC transaction by the US government comes just a few weeks after Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump proposed to establish a “strategic national Bitcoin stockpile” at the Bitcoin 2024 conference. After that, rumors emerged that Democrats under the lead of Kamala Harris could empty the BTC holdings by the US government from confiscations. While Harris pleads to take a more pro-crypto stance, several experts refuse this claim, based on the latest actions by her.

At press time, BTC traded at $59,336.

Bitcoin price
Bitcoin price, 1-day chart | Source: BTCUSDT on TradingView.com

Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com

Source: newsbtc.com

Related stories
1 month ago - Among Trump's promises was a vow to fire SEC Chair Gary Gensler “on day one” — which, as discussed, may not be possible.
1 month ago - Today, enjoy the Empire newsletter on Blockworks.co. Tomorrow, get the news delivered directly to your inbox. Subscribe to the Empire...
1 month ago - The US government has four official reserve assets; why shouldn’t bitcoin be the fifth?
1 month ago - Crypto markets cooled followed Wednesday’s Consumer Price Index report, which saw inflation drop in line with economists’ expectations.
1 month ago - The Republican Vice Presidential candidate has owned between $100,001 and $250,000 worth of Bitcoin since 2021.
Other stories
43 minutes ago - A potential rate cut could boost market liquidity, driving investors towards riskier assets like Bitcoin, but may also introduce short-term volatility. The post Polymarket traders see 99% chance of rate cuts this week appeared first on...
58 minutes ago - An early crypto investor has pleaded guilty to filing tax returns that underreported the capital gains he earned from selling millions of dollars worth of Bitcoin (BTC). According to the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), Frank Richard...
58 minutes ago - Digital assets manager CoinShares says that institutional crypto investors poured hundreds of millions in capital from digital asset products last week. In its latest Digital Asset Fund Flows report, CoinShares says that institutional...
58 minutes ago - Coin98 Super Wallet, your gateway to the open internet, has released the version 15 update. This new version improves the user experience by adding AI support and in-app chat for easier Web 3.0 interactions, paving the way for easy...
58 minutes ago - Sucking up to politicians and the powers that be is the last thing crypto needs. It defeats the industry’s purpose and foundational vision of grassroots empowerment. It’s supposed to make users autonomous, self-sovereign entities. Only a...