ArXiv to Ban Researchers Behind AI-Generated Hallucinations

The preprint server arXiv is cracking down on AI-generated scholarly slop. A new policy, confirmed by advisory council member Thomas Dietterich, imposes a one-year ban on submitters found to have included inappropriate AI-produced content. After the ban, future submissions will also require peer review before being hosted on the platform.

This move follows widespread issues with fake citations and nonsensical diagrams in peer-reviewed literature. The policy, derived from arXiv's existing moderation standards, aims to enforce “general scrupulousness and care of preparation” in submissions. Dietterich, an emeritus professor at Oregon State University, shared the news in a thread on X.

The rules apply to content before it even enters the traditional peer-review process, signaling a stricter enforcement of scholarly standards across multiple scientific fields.