This week, an official report revealed Australia's pioneering teen social media ban has failed. Despite the law, roughly seven in ten children remain on major platforms. The data also shows no notable reduction in reported cyberbullying or image-based abuse.
The policy was touted as a solution for online safety. Experts across digital rights, youth mental health, and academia warned it would not work and could create new dangers. The eSafety commissioner herself expressed doubts. The government proceeded despite a lack of evidence.
The ban's enforcement relies on age verification, a flawed approach. Facial estimation software is inaccurate, while stricter methods create privacy and security vulnerabilities. The fundamental problem remains unaddressed: the extractive business models and harmful design features of tech platforms.
The government has accused tech firms of non-compliance and launched investigations. Critics argue this focus is a red herring. A more effective path would challenge models based on behavioral advertising and problematic algorithms. A proposed digital duty of care may offer a better avenue. For other nations considering similar bans, Australia's experience serves as a warning.